All research
Field Note 09InfrastructureExperiment · 11 Oct 2026

How much media fits on one T4?

Speech, images and a small video experiment reveal where a compact shared worker starts to strain.

A lens, waveform and film frame balanced above one compute pedestal.
9failed shared SDXL requests retained
Exploratory benchmark

First-party engineering evidence. Results apply to the tested configuration and sample; they are not an SLA or a general model ranking.

THE TAKEAWAY

Memory is a product constraint.

What the compact host handled

SD1.5 completed its four image-quality prompts at a 5.14-second median; two mixed-load images took a 7.95-second median. Adding image work raised queueing for other tasks. These are small workloads, not steady-state capacity estimates.

The shared SDXL attempt exhausted host RAM and its worker was killed. Nine failed requests remain in the evidence. A later isolated SDXL retest cannot be used to claim safe shared capacity.

Audio needs its own evaluation

Whisper WER was 38.0% on the twelve Swahili clips and 19.1% on twelve Nigerian English clips. Regional acoustic supplements were tiny convenience samples, with differing recording conditions; they do not support ranking accents. Kokoro generated English on CPU with a 2.33-second median across twelve requests.

Feasible is not production-ready

Wan 2.1 1.3B produced a 17-frame, 448×256 video at eight frames per second in 258.11 seconds, after 260.98 seconds of readiness work. It required an isolated run and heavy swap. This was a feasibility result, not a usable interactive video service.

Four corrected durable media jobs survived an API restart and idempotent replays. Earlier harness failures are retained; successful queue recovery does not make all co-resident models safe.

THE MEASUREMENTS

Results, in context.

Selected observations
WorkloadResultBoundary
SD1.5 quality · 4 images5.14s median512px, warm loopback
SD1.5 mixed · 2 images7.95s medianShared host
SDXL shared9 failuresHost RAM exhaustion
Kokoro EN · 12 generations2.33s medianCPU on shared host
Wan 1.3B · 1 video258.11s generationIsolated; not production capacity

Failures and isolated retests are intentionally not merged into one success average.

TEST SETUP

How we ran it.

  1. Cape Town g4dn.xlarge: one T4, four vCPUs, 16 GiB RAM. Gemma 4 E4B, Qwen retrieval and Whisper shared the host. SD1.5 and SDXL were tested one at a time alongside that core.
  2. Images used four matched prompts, seed 42, 25 steps and FP16. SD1.5 ran at 512px; SDXL used offload/slicing/tiling at 512px and 1024px. Core/media mixes used four concurrent clients on loopback.
  3. Whisper evaluated twelve Swahili FLEURS and twelve Nigerian English recordings, with an isolated supplement of six Kenyan, six South African and three Ghanaian clips from an EdAcc derivative. Kokoro used twelve synthetic English generations. Wan video ran separately with core workers stopped.
WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE

The limits matter.

  • Loopback excludes customer networking. Small image sets were inspected qualitatively, with no automated aesthetic score.
  • Isolated SDXL/video retests do not establish co-residency. GPU sampling may miss brief peaks. Speech samples may overlap model training; no general accent accuracy estimate.
  • Synthetic billing rates tested arithmetic only. They are not customer pricing.
OPEN FINDINGS

Evidence & sources.

The public extract contains the methods, selected results and caveats in this note. It is a curated summary, not the full raw run. Fingerprints identify the retained source artifacts; gated audio and private operational records are not included.

Download results extract
Source artifact fingerprints · SHA-256
README.mdbdc82eae08967518ad702b964d2d6e3cdad41871317a42fffbc735f4b5f80bbb
summary.json313ed32995503ae058061262e97da7261b2581786a867b2bcb72479c48e9a994

Suggested citation: Embiro Labs Research. “How much media fits on one T4?” Published 12 Oct 2026. embiro.ai/research/shared-media-on-one-t4

Report a correction